Abolishing Grading System

In A Proposal To Abolish Grading by ca cope withal of Minnesota Goodman, the author informs the readers about the ideas of nullifying the policy of tearing down and judging students solely by exams. The writer believes that grading depreciates teaching and creates a bad spirit, leading to cheating and/or plagiarizing. Although majority of the professors agree, some people besides question the idea. How else will the graduate schools, the foundations, the corporations know whom to accept, reward, hire?How will the talent scouts know who to tap? (line 8-10)Again, Goodman answers, by test the applicants, of course. Dean Whitla easily counters this by proposing Harvard Universitys very own, unique admission system. The objection is ludicrous, Goodman says. Although the authors claim is potent, there are elements of th break to agree and disagree about. Paul Goodman states and supports his claim clearly throughout his proposal and does a good job of cancelling out the opposing sides argument. In the medieval university, the whole point of the grueling trial of the candidate was whether or not to accept him as a peer. It was certainly not to pit one young fellow against an new(prenominal) in an ugly competition. (line 27-29) Goodmans comparison of the medieval times to now supports his claim that if the goal for testing at present is to find out peoples weakness, then whats the point? Although it is somewhat true, how does Goodman, or anyone for that matter, for sure know that that is the aim? One can only if testify.Goodmans overall declaration to abolish grading sounds spiffy and an all-around good idea. His thought that it can lead to cheating and plagiarizing is an on-point proposal that anyone could agree on. .. bang-up majority of professors agree that grading hinders teaching and creates a bad spirit, going as far as cheating and plagiarizing. For instance, homework. Many students can copy other someone elses in result of not learning anything. He also mentioned that grading only creates cliques, segregating the smart students and the not so smart ones.It also creates competition between each one since everybody wants to obtain the highest grade. What is this all going to lead to? Nothing but just competition. It invalidates the purpose of going to school to come through education. Goodmans suggestion to base students on their test scores can be the good, but last resort. Testing decreases the chances of cheating and/or plagiarizing due to the unforgiving supervision when it comes to a serious matter. It will motivate students to study more and take education seriously.All in all, Goodmans proposal to abolish grading is a roller coaster ride. Nobody really knows if the goal is to discover students weakness, but in reality, testing is a plausible reason to avoid cheating and plagiarizing, and any other bad spirits that may come with. With describing such a common situation, he put forth his claim and provided readers with a back arise to support it. There may be some to disagree to, but there is definitely something to agree with, and it ultimately leads his claim to an upward state.